Tag: criminal justice
-
The limits of DNA evidence
DNA is treated as the gold standard of forensic proof, but it has real limits. Here’s where it can mislead juries and what it doesn’t actually prove.
-
Why sentencing can vary widely
Two people convicted of similar crimes can receive dramatically different sentences. The reasons are structural, well-documented, and often invisible to the public.
-
Conspiracy Theories Around Epstein’s Death: Separating Evidence from Speculation
Epstein’s death produced years of conspiracy theory and genuine institutional failure. Here’s what the forensic record supports and what remains unknown.
-
Confessions aren’t always reliable
False confessions account for a meaningful share of wrongful convictions. The interrogation methods that produce them are still routine in U.S. policing.
-
The system isn’t always designed for fairness
Many institutions optimize for efficiency, throughput, or risk reduction—not fairness. Recognizing the actual goal explains a lot of frustrating outcomes.
-
The role of mandatory minimums
Mandatory minimum sentencing was sold as a tough-on-crime fix. Decades of data show it produced mass incarceration, racial disparities, and uncertain deterrent effect.