Every legal system that pays lawyers by the hour creates a perverse incentive: the worse the case goes, the better they do. Most attorneys resist that gravity through professional ethics and a practical interest in their reputations. A subset don’t. In high-conflict family-law and civil-litigation cases, a small but consequential number of attorneys deliberately escalate disputes that could have been resolved, knowing every motion, every objection, every continuance puts more billable hours on the meter. The clients usually don’t realize what’s happening until the retainer is gone and the case is no closer to over.
This isn’t a conspiracy theory. It’s a structural problem the bar associations have studied, written about, and largely failed to fix.
The playbook
Scorched-earth lawyering follows a recognizable pattern. The attorney files unnecessary motions on procedural points, drags discovery into satellite fights about scope and privilege, refuses reasonable settlement offers without explaining why, encourages the client to dig in on emotional issues that won’t matter at trial, and frames the other side as a villain whose every action requires response. Each of these generates billable work. None of them moves the case toward resolution. In divorce specifically, the playbook often includes vexatious custody filings, refusal to stipulate to obvious facts, and discovery demands designed to bury the other side rather than gather useful information. Judges see the pattern and grumble about it from the bench, but rarely sanction.
How to recognize it
A few warning signs separate aggressive-but-legitimate lawyering from the scorched-earth version. Watch for billing entries that don’t correspond to visible progress. Ask whether each motion advances a defined goal or just creates work. Pay attention to whether your attorney accurately describes opposing counsel’s positions or systematically caricatures them. If they discourage you from settlement conversations, push for trial on issues that could be stipulated, or repeatedly tell you “we can’t trust them” without specifics, ask why. A good attorney will tell you when a fight isn’t worth having; a bad one will tell you every fight is essential. Also notice whether your case is being staffed by junior associates whose hours bill steadily but whose contributions to the actual resolution are unclear.
What to do about it
If you suspect your lawyer is feeding the fire, ask for a written case strategy memo with milestones and projected costs — a reasonable request a good attorney will accommodate. If they can’t or won’t produce one, that’s your answer. Get a second opinion from another attorney on the current state of the case and what reasonable next steps would cost. Switch counsel if you need to; the file is yours. For overbilling, file fee arbitration with the state or local bar. For genuine misconduct — neglect, dishonesty, conflicts — file a disciplinary complaint. The longer you wait, the less leverage you have, because the retainer keeps draining.
Bottom line
Most lawyers aren’t running this scam, but the ones who are count on you being too overwhelmed to notice. Track the work, demand strategy, get second opinions, and don’t confuse aggression for advocacy. Your case is supposed to end someday.
Leave a Reply