For about three decades, American education policy converged on a single message: go to college. Public schools tracked toward it, federal aid expanded for it, employers screened for it, and parents internalized it. The theory was that a four-year degree was the ticket to the middle class and that more degrees would mean a stronger economy. The theory had partial support and large unintended costs, and the bill is now coming due.
This is not an argument against higher education. It is an argument against treating one credential as universally appropriate.
The cost side that nobody priced
When demand for a credential rises and supply is gated by accreditation, prices rise. Tuition at public four-year universities roughly tripled in real terms between the early 1980s and the late 2010s. Private tuition rose even faster. Federal aid expansion, designed to make college more accessible, ended up financing much of that price increase rather than absorbing it. The result was a generation graduating with debt loads that previous generations did not carry, often without the wage premium that made the original deal work.
The damage is not only financial. Students who enroll and do not finish, roughly forty percent of those who start, often end up with debt and no credential, the worst possible combination. The push to send everyone to college never accounted for the people for whom college was the wrong choice and who would pay for the experiment with their twenties.
What the trades lost
While college enrollment surged, the trades thinned out. High schools cut shop programs. Counselors steered the marginal student toward a four-year track. Apprenticeships, once a standard path to a stable income, were stigmatized as the option for kids who could not hack academics. The labor market is now reckoning with the consequences. Electricians, plumbers, welders, and skilled construction workers are scarce, well-paid, and aging. Replacement is not happening fast enough.
Many of these jobs pay six figures within a few years, require minimal debt to enter, and resist offshoring and automation in ways that white-collar work increasingly does not. The cultural assumption that they were lesser was always more about social signaling than economic logic. The mandate to go to college translated into a quiet bias against the work that builds and maintains the country.
What a sensible policy would look like
A better system would treat post-secondary training as plural. Four-year degrees for people whose fields require them, two-year associates and certificates for people whose careers reward focused skills, and apprenticeships for trades and skilled work, all funded and respected without hierarchy. Some countries do versions of this and produce both better wage outcomes and lower debt loads. The American system optimized for one path and called the others failure.
The fix is not anti-college. It is anti-monoculture.
Bottom line
The college-for-all mandate was sold as a ladder and worked as one for some students. For many others, it was a debt machine and a detour from better-fitting paths. Treating one credential as universal was always going to break, and it has.
Leave a Reply