The for-profit college sector has been investigated, sued, settled, fined, and partially dismantled multiple times in the past 15 years. The pattern is consistent across cases: aggressive recruiting of low-income students, federally backed loans, programs that don’t translate into employment, default rates well above the national average, and institutional collapse that leaves students with debt and credits that don’t transfer. What’s striking isn’t the bad actors โ it’s that the accreditation system kept signing off on them.
The track record is documented
Corinthian Colleges collapsed in 2015 after the Department of Education found systemic misrepresentation of job placement rates. ITT Tech closed in 2016 after federal sanctions. The Art Institutes operated for decades before mass closures in 2018 and 2023. Settlements with state attorneys general and the Federal Trade Commission have produced billions in loan forgiveness through the borrower defense to repayment program. Federal data has consistently shown for-profit graduates carry more debt and earn less than graduates of public institutions in comparable fields. The Department of Education’s gainful employment rule, repeatedly proposed, repealed, and revived, was specifically designed to flag programs whose graduates couldn’t afford the debt they incurred. Industry lobbying has slowed every iteration.
Accreditation was supposed to be the filter
Accreditors are private nonprofit bodies recognized by the Department of Education to certify institutional quality, and a school’s accreditation is what makes its students eligible for federal financial aid. The Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools accredited Corinthian, ITT Tech, and other failed chains. ACICS lost federal recognition in 2016, regained it under the next administration, and lost it again. Other accreditors have continued certifying for-profit schools through mergers, sales to private equity, and conversions to nonprofit status that exist mostly on paper. The accreditation industry’s revenue depends on the schools it accredits, which is the kind of conflict of interest that should produce more skepticism than it does.
The conversion playbook
A specific maneuver worth understanding: when a for-profit college faces regulatory pressure, it often converts to nonprofit status by selling itself to a newly created nonprofit entity, sometimes one tied to the same ownership through service contracts. This sidesteps for-profit-specific regulations while leaving the operational reality unchanged. The Government Accountability Office has flagged the practice. The Internal Revenue Service has questioned some specific conversions. Most have nonetheless been allowed to proceed. Students enrolled in these institutions often have no way to tell from marketing materials that they’re attending what amounts to a relabeled for-profit, and the institutional incentives โ tuition revenue, executive compensation, recruitment-heavy budgets โ don’t change after the conversion.
The bottom line
Before enrolling in any college, look up the institution’s cohort default rate, gainful employment data, and graduate earnings on College Scorecard. Check whether credits transfer to nearby community colleges or four-year publics โ for-profit credits often don’t. Verify accreditation through the Department of Education’s database, not the school’s marketing. None of this is hard, and it routinely flags exactly the schools that would otherwise leave a student with $40,000 in loans and a credential employers don’t recognize.
Leave a Reply