The popular story about college costs blames bloated administrations, climbing-wall amenities, and greedy universities. Some of that is real. None of it is the main driver. The big shift in public university tuition over the last forty years tracks one variable more closely than any other: state appropriations per student, which have been cut roughly in half in inflation-adjusted terms since 1980.
The numbers are unambiguous
State Higher Education Executive Officers Association data shows that average state and local funding per full-time-equivalent student peaked around $9,000 in the late 1970s and has fluctuated between $7,500 and $9,000 since, with deep cuts after the 2001 and 2008 recessions that never fully reversed. Adjusted for the actual cost of educating students, which has risen with healthcare and labor costs, the per-student gap is substantially larger. Universities replaced the lost state revenue with tuition. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities calculated that a $1,000 cut in state funding correlates with roughly a $250 to $300 tuition increase the same year, with effects compounding over time. Publicly available state budget data tells the same story across most states.
The political logic was straightforward
Higher education is one of the few large state budget items that’s discretionary in practice. Medicaid is federally co-funded and politically untouchable. K-12 is constitutionally protected in most states. Corrections costs are sticky. Higher education has tuition as a release valve — schools can raise it when appropriations fall, so legislators can cut without producing immediate service gaps. Across decades and parties, this dynamic produced steady disinvestment. Some states (California, Wyoming) maintained funding better than others (Pennsylvania, Arizona, Louisiana). Tuition gaps across states track these funding decisions closely.
Administrative growth is real but smaller
The “administrative bloat” critique isn’t wrong; non-instructional staff has grown faster than instructional staff at many universities. Compliance costs, federal reporting, student services, and IT have all expanded. But studies that decompose tuition increases — including a Government Accountability Office analysis — consistently find that declining state funding accounts for a larger share of the increase than administrative growth does. Climbing walls and fancy dorms get media attention because they’re visible; payroll for assistant deans of student engagement is less photogenic but adds up. Both are real factors. Neither is the main one.
Who pays has shifted
In 1980, a typical public university got roughly 70% of its revenue from state funding and 30% from tuition. By the 2020s, those proportions are often reversed, with tuition exceeding 50% at many flagships. The bill didn’t disappear — it moved from state taxpayers to students and families, who in turn relied on federal student loans to pay it. The federal loan program made the shift politically possible. Without easy borrowing, families would have hit a wall and political pressure would have forced re-funding. With loans available, the cost was absorbable on paper, and the consequences (student debt growth, delayed homeownership, declining enrollment among working-class families) became visible only later.
Bottom line
College got expensive because states decided someone else should pay. The “someone else” was 18-year-olds with loan paperwork. Reversing the trend requires reversing the policy.
Leave a Reply